Cognassist

Leadership inclusion insights

See inclusion across your whole provider, in one real-time view

The Lead stage of the APDR cycle (assess, plan, do, review): inclusion dashboard software that gives leaders one live, whole-provider view of inclusion, built from the golden thread every stage feeds.

What it is

One real-time view of inclusion across your whole provider

Insights (the leadership dashboards we call InclusionIntel) is inclusion dashboard software built for leaders: a single, real-time view of the whole inclusion pipeline, from who has been assessed, through the support delivered and evidenced, to outcomes. It is an admin-only leadership surface, delivered through Power BI and built for the people accountable for inclusion.

  • Aggregated automatically from the golden thread that assess, plan, do and review build, so you read one view instead of assembling it from spreadsheets and manual reports.
  • Real-time and whole-provider: the institutional picture of inclusion, not a snapshot rebuilt before an audit.
  • Tutors work in their own learners' records and plans. The whole-provider dashboard is a leadership view, and needs administrator scope.

What it shows

The metrics that matter, whole-provider and down to the individual tutor

See where inclusion is landing across the provider and where it stalls. Insights turns the golden thread into the metrics leaders steer by, whole-provider at org level and down to the individual tutor.

  • The six-stage proactive pathway (invited, assessed, identified, evaluating learning barriers, needs assessment, newly supported), shown as a conversion view.
  • The proportion of learners who have moved off proactive support, plus tutor and learner adoption. Stepping a learner off, with evidence, is success.
  • Evidence quality month by month on a red, amber, green (RAG) view, and timeliness against target, flagged red below 80% within 30 days.
  • Drill down to the individual tutor and learner to see which records to sample. There is no department, site or curriculum-area breakdown.

What it produces

Oversight that is itself evidence of active, data-led leadership

One view for the self-assessment report (SAR) and quality improvement plan (QIP), governance and board reporting, and pre-inspection preparation, compiled automatically from platform data with no manual data-gathering.

  • It changes how you lead inclusion: read the data, evaluate strategy against outcomes, and act on gaps before they become findings. Judge inclusion by whether outcomes improve, not by whether activity is happening.
  • The report's existence and use is itself evidence of the active, data-led oversight the renewed Ofsted framework expects.
  • Insights is the oversight view, not a funding tool. It does not export to your management information system (MIS) or the Individualised Learner Record (ILR), and the funding decision stays yours.

Where it sits: Lead, the leadership view across the whole APDR cycle

Lead is the leadership layer across the whole graduated approach. What Assess surfaced, Plan agreed, and Do and review delivered and evidenced is rolled up so leaders see and steer inclusion at provider scale. You are looking at Lead: oversight of the cycle, not a fifth step inside it.

Step 05 of 05

Lead

Leaders see the whole cycle roll up into one real-time view and steer inclusion across the provider. Admin-only.

  • The aggregate view of the same golden thread

You are here

Customer story · Educationwise Academy

Inclusion data, built into weekly reporting and the quality framework

Educationwise Academy built Cognassist data into weekly reporting and its quality-assurance framework, so quality leaders could see inclusion across the provider and act on it, not just record it. Support moved from self-disclosure and tutor instinct to a consistent, evidence-based process owned by quality leadership.

Read the Educationwise story

  • OutstandingOfsted rating
  • 12 monthsOfsted turnaround
  • EqualAchievement for high-needs learners
Using Cognassist, we can quickly see engagement reports, measure learner progress and provide a whole package of support for the apprentice.
Asa GordonAssistant Principal Employer Responsiveness, Bradford College

Evidence, not just describe

Evidence inclusion for leadership and inspection, not just describe it

The whole-provider oversight this gives you is what evidences inclusion under the renewed Ofsted framework: active, data-led leadership you can show, not just describe. It helps you evidence inclusion for leadership and inspection; it does not make you compliant, and no regulator requires or approves it. Evidencing inclusion for Ofsted is a job of its own, and we have a guide to exactly that.

See how leadership oversight evidences inclusion for Ofsted

FAQ

The questions leaders actually ask

  • What is inclusion dashboard software?
    It is software that gives leaders a single, real-time view of inclusion across the whole provider. In Cognassist it is Insights, the Lead stage of the APDR cycle (assess, plan, do, review): a Power BI dashboard, aggregated automatically from the golden thread every stage builds. It is the inclusion reporting software further education (FE) colleges and apprenticeship providers use for leadership oversight, without manual data-gathering.
  • How do leaders get visibility of inclusion across a provider?
    They read one whole-provider view instead of reconstructing the picture from scattered records. Insights shows the six-stage proactive pathway, the proportion of learners moved off proactive support, tutor and learner adoption, evidence quality month by month, and timeliness. Leaders evaluate strategy against outcomes and act on gaps before they become findings.
  • Who can see the dashboards?
    Admins. Insights is an admin-only leadership surface, delivered through Power BI and gated so only administrator scope can open it. Tutors work in their own learners' records and plans, not the whole-provider dashboard. Even a Head of Quality needs administrator scope to view it.
  • What does Insights show, and at what level of detail?
    The six-stage proactive pathway as a conversion view, the proportion of learners moved off proactive support, tutor and learner adoption, evidence quality month by month on a red, amber, green (RAG) view, and timeliness against target. You can read it whole-provider at org level and drill down to the individual tutor and learner. There is no department, site or curriculum-area breakdown.
  • Does it show whether our achievement gap is narrowing?
    No. Achievement-gap narrowing is not a metric we display. Insights surfaces the proactive pathway, the step-off rate, adoption, evidence quality and timeliness. We are straight about what it does and does not show, rather than claim outcome-trend dashboards Cognassist cannot produce.
  • How is this different from the reports in our management information system?
    Your management information system stores records and runs operational reports. Insights gives leaders the whole-provider inclusion oversight a system of record does not: the proactive-pathway funnel, step-off, adoption and evidence quality, compiled automatically without manual data-gathering. It sits on top of the systems you already run, rather than replacing them.
  • Does it make us Ofsted-compliant?
    No. Insights helps you evidence active, data-led oversight of inclusion. It does not make you compliant, no regulator requires or approves it, and it does not guarantee a grade. The report is evidence of your oversight; the inspection outcome is yours.
  • Does it export to our MIS or ILR, or claim funding for us?
    No. Insights is the oversight view. It does not export to your management information system or the Individualised Learner Record, and it does not claim funding. Record-level exports and the funding decision, including eligibility and any reconciliation, are separate and stay yours. There is no funding code and no per-learner rate here.

See inclusion across your whole provider

Book a demo and we will show you the whole-provider view leaders use to see and steer inclusion, rather than reconstruct it before an inspection.